Saepe expugnaverunt me a juventute mea

Comparison with P-Br Ms. 032, f. 113r allows to infer that the differentia would have been 152g: here it was left unwritten because the antiphon preceding this one in the original document, likely Beati omnes (C. ID 001587), was using the same differentia just as in P-Br Ms. 032 (as well as being the first in the series of antiphons for second vespers).